Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Oncologist ; 27(1): 67-78, 2022 02 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34498352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Older patients with cancer are at risk of physical decline and impaired quality of life during oncological treatment. Exercise training has the potential to reduce these challenges. The study aim was to investigate the feasibility and effect of a multimodal exercise intervention in older patients with advanced cancer (stages III/IV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-four older adults (≥65 years) with advanced pancreatic, biliary tract, or non-small cell lung cancer who received systemic oncological treatment were randomized 1:1 to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention was a 12-week multimodal exercise-based program including supervised exercise twice weekly followed by a protein supplement, a home-based walking program, and nurse-led support and counseling. The primary endpoint was change in physical function (30-second chair stand test) at 13 weeks. RESULTS: Median age of the participants was 72 years (interquartile range [IQR] 68-75). Median adherence to the exercise sessions was 69% (IQR 21-88) and 75% (IQR 33-100) for the walking program. At 13 weeks, there was a significant difference in change scores of 2.4 repetitions in the chair stand test, favoring the intervention group (p < .0001). Furthermore, significant beneficial effects were seen for physical endurance (6-minute walk test), hand grip strength, physical activity, symptom burden, symptoms of depression and anxiety, global health status (quality of life), and lean body mass. No effects were seen for dose intensity, hospitalizations, or survival. CONCLUSION: A 12-week multimodal exercise intervention with targeted support proved effective in improving physical function in older patients with advanced cancer during oncological treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Aged , Exercise Therapy , Hand Strength , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Life
2.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 19(4): e243-e257, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828706

ABSTRACT

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) increases with older age. Cancer and treatment-related side effects often lead to physical decline, poor treatment adherence, and a lower quality of life. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of exercise reported by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on physical function, physical fitness (ie, aerobic capacity, muscle strength) physical activity, and psychological well-being in older patients with CRC undergoing chemotherapy. Eight RCTs with 552 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The mean age across the RCTs was 58.5 years, and 2 RCTs excluded patients aged > 80 years. The meta-analyses showed a low level of evidence for a small beneficial effect of exercise on self-reported physical function (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.48) and global quality of life (SMD, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.02-0.43) and low level of evidence for a moderate effect of exercise reducing fatigue (SMD, -0.49; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.19) for patients receiving chemotherapy for CRC. We found no evidence for a beneficial effect of exercise on physical fitness. No adverse events related to the exercise interventions were reported. The evidence for the effect of exercise on physical outcomes and psychological well-being during chemotherapy for patients with CRC and especially for older patients is sparse. However, exercise during chemotherapy for patients with CRC is feasible and safe. We found a moderate to high risk of bias in most of the included studies, small sample sizes, and a low number of included patients. Moreover, all studies had excluded patients with comorbidities or walking impairment, a group of patients who would probably benefit the most from exercise. This positive result requires verification in larger trials of older and frail patients receiving chemotherapy for CRC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Exercise Therapy/methods , Fatigue/rehabilitation , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/psychology , Exercise Therapy/adverse effects , Fatigue/diagnosis , Fatigue/etiology , Fatigue/psychology , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Incidence , Physical Fitness/psychology , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Self Report/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
3.
Eur J Cancer ; 72: 20-27, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28024263

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: During recent years, several new life-prolonging therapeutic options have been introduced for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the changes in the survival of patients diagnosed with mPCa prior to and in the early period of the implementation of these new agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 207 men diagnosed in 1997 and 316 men diagnosed in the period 2007-2013 with de novo mPCa and managed with initial endocrine therapy. Men were followed for overall survival and PCa-specific survival. RESULTS: At the time of diagnosis, men diagnosed in the period 2007-2013 had less co-morbidity, lower prostrate-specific antigen levels and lower clinical tumour categories than men diagnosed in 1997. A significantly higher proportion of men diagnosed in 1997 were managed with surgical castration (57% versus 9%). Only one patient diagnosed in 1997 received second-line therapy compared with 81 men (26%) diagnosed in the period 2007-2013. The median overall survival was significantly longer for men diagnosed between 2007 and 2013 compared with men diagnosed in 1997 (39.4 months versus 24.2 months, p < 0.0001). Likewise, the cumulative incidence of PCa-specific death was higher among men diagnosed in 1997 compared with men diagnosed between 2007 and 2013, with 5-year cumulative incidences of 72% and 47%, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Survival in men diagnosed with metastatic PCa has improved significantly over time. The improved survival can in part be explained by lead-time bias, but also by the introduction of new life-prolonging treatments.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Hormone Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Orchiectomy , Prostate-Specific Antigen/analysis , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Radiotherapy/methods , Regression Analysis , Time Factors
4.
Acta Oncol ; 55(12): 1456-1460, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27333339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Danish Cancer Registry holds information on all prostate cancers (PCa) cases, including diagnostic TNM. However, stratification according to contemporary risk classification is not possible because histopathological grading and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level are not registered. The objective of the study was to report clinical characteristics and primary management of men diagnosed with PCa from a primary referral center in Denmark. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Records on all men diagnosed with PCa at the Department of Urology, Frederiksberg Hospital, 1 January 2007 - 31 December 2013, were reviewed. Clinical characteristics and primary treatment were recorded. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group classification was used. RESULTS: A total of 1934 men with a median age of 69 years (interquartile range 65-75) were diagnosed with PCa in the study period resulting in an incidence rate (World Standard Population) of 84/100 000. Overall, 18% were classified as low-risk, 34% as intermediate-risk, 23% as high-risk, 8% as very high-risk and 17% had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Among men age <65 years 70% had low- or intermediate-risk disease, while this was the case for 58% of men aged 65-75 and 22% of men aged >75. Metastatic disease was found in 11% of men <65 years, 17% of men 65-75 years and 23% of men >75 years. In total 73% of men with low-risk PCa were managed on watchful waiting or active surveillance. Curatively intended treatment was performed in 56% of men with intermediate-risk and 61% of men with high-risk PCa, while hormonal therapy was used in 90% of men with very high-risk and 98% of men with metastatic PCa. CONCLUSION: In a population without systematic PSA testing we found a large proportion of patients presenting with advanced PCa at diagnosis. Elderly patients presented with more advanced disease. Curative treatment was primarily used in younger men with clinically localized PCa.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Risk Assessment , Watchful Waiting , Aged , Denmark/epidemiology , Disease Progression , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Referral and Consultation , Time Factors
5.
Scand J Public Health ; 44(3): 228-32, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26511591

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aims of the present study were to investigate referral patterns and the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) before and after the Movember campaign was initiated in Denmark. METHODS: All men (n=2817) referred to the Department of Urology at Frederiksberg Hospital with suspicion of having PCa in the period 1 January 2007-31 January 2014 were identified. Based on the referral date, patients were categorised as pre-Movember (1 January 2007-31 January 2011) and Movember (1 February 2011-31 January 2014), respectively. Annual referral-rates/100.000 inhabitants were calculated and compared with rate-ratio (RR) tests. RESULTS: The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at referral dropped significantly from 9.8 ng/mL in 2007-2011 to 7.9 ng/mL in 2011-2014,p< 0.001. The incidence rate of men referred with suspicion of PCa increased from 134/100.000 in the pre-Movember period to 168/100.000 in the Movember period (RR 1.25 [95% CI 1.16-1.35]). In contrast to what we anticipated, there was no increase in referral in the months following the campaign. The incidence rates of men diagnosed with PCa and low-risk PCa were similar in the Movember period and the pre-Movember period (PCa: RR 1.08 [0.97-1.21]; low-risk PCa: RR 1.29 [0.98-1.73]). CONCLUSIONS: After the initiation of the Movember campaign a significant decline in the PSA level at referral and an increase in the number of patients referred under suspicion of PCa was observed; however, only minor differences in referral patterns and PCa diagnosis were detected. The results indicate that the Movember campaign had a limited immediate effect on referral, however, it may have contributed to an increased awareness of PCa.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Denmark , Humans , Male , Prostate-Specific Antigen/analysis , Risk Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...